EXCLUSIVE ‘Sex is NOT limited to male or female’: Fury over new World Health Organization gender guidance which ‘dismisses basic biology’
- EXCLUSIVE: New WHO guidance will go ‘beyond’ binary approach, it says
- Health experts have slammed the move, saying it is ‘unscientific’ and ‘worrying’
- Comes amid concerning rise in use of woke gender-neutral language in the NHS
Sex is ‘not limited’ to being male or female, the World Health Organization (WHO) will say in new guidance.
The WHO, an international authority on all things health, said it was ‘going beyond’ the use of binary terms to ‘recognise gender and sexual diversity’.
But experts called the move a ‘dismissal of basic biology’ and could lead to medical advice being de-sexed and over-complicated.
The change will be to gender guidance originally published in 2011 and is used by public health officials.
It is not clear exactly what the WHO’s new advice will say, but the agency explained its rationale for the change on its website.
WHO said its guidance would go ‘beyond non-binary approaches to gender and health to recognise gender and sexual diversity or the concepts that gender identity exists on a continuum and that sex is not limited to male or female’.
The global health body risks wading into a wider row about gender-neutral health advice.
Experts today criticised new woke World Health Organization guidance hinting at there being more than two sexes as ‘unscientific’ and that it could open the door to language changes that will disadvantage women and girls
The WHO guidance review (pictured) states that sex ‘is not limited to male or female’
Professor Jenny Gamble, a midwifery expert from Coventry University, described the WHO’s change as ‘problematic’.
‘It is a dismissal of basic biology — and mistake,’ she told MailOnline. ‘Biology is a key determinant of health and illness.
‘Not being clear about basic biology opens the door to a range of problems, including very poor health communication but also distorted data.’
What is the difference between sex and gender?
Sex, as defined by the Government, refers to the biological aspects of an individual as determined by their anatomy.
This anatomy is produced by their chromosomes and hormones.
There are two universally accepted sexes, male and female.
For example, males (XY chromosomes) are born with a penis and testes and females (XX chromosomes) are born with a vagina.
There are some cases where children are born with attributes of both sexes, such as being born with a womb and testicles.
These are called differences in sex development or being intersex.
Gender, on the other hand, is defined by the Government as a social construct.
This relates to the behaviours and features generally attributed to either men or to women.
A person’s gender identity is how they perceive their own gender.
For most people this aligns with their sex.
However, some people do not feel their gender matches their sex, this is called gender dysphoria.
Dr Karleen Gribble, an expert in nursing and midwifery from Western Sydney University, told MailOnline the WHO’s announcement was unscientific.
‘The wording regarding there being more than male and female sexes is concerning,’ she said.
‘The website says that the handbook is being updated “in light of new scientific evidence and conceptual progress on gender, health and development”.
‘However, there is no new scientific evidence suggesting there are more than two sexes.
‘Rather, the idea that there are more than two sexes, is a postmodern, unscientific understanding that should not be supported by the WHO.’
A person’s sex is determined by their biological traits.
Gender represents how someone feels about their identity, meaning there can be mismatch with a person’s sex, as occurs in cases of gender dysphoria.
The NHS is currently caught up in controversy about de-sexing health advice after a series of revelations by MailOnline.
This website found the health service had removed the terms ‘woman’ and ‘women’ from its womb cancer, ovarian cancer and menopause pages as well as replacing the term ‘breastfeeding’ with ‘chestfeeding’ in advice for trans parents.
There have also been concerns about women losing access to single-sex spaces like bathrooms and hospital wards as a result of blurring the definition of a woman.
However, Dr Gribble said the WHO may be updating its guidance to be more inclusive to intersex people, who are born with biological characteristics of the two sexes.
But she said this could come across ‘inaccurate and stigmatising’.
She is also concerned about the body’s focus on gender identity rather than the health inequality women and girls suffer around the world.
‘If this occurs, this will almost certainly dilute focus on the severe health disadvantage that women and girls face in many countries because they are female which can only be a bad thing,’ she said.
‘Many of us who work internationally in maternal and child health are very concerned about the push to desex language spilling over into UN organisations like WHO and United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund.’
The WHO guidance is for public health managers and in the UK these experts generally work in local government but some are also employed by the NHS and Government.
They can take on a wide variety of responsibilities, such as emergency planning for events like heatwaves or pandemics, or public health messaging like stop smoking campaigns.
The WHO’s guidance review is currently in a gathering feedback stage, with the final version due to be rolled out sometime next month. The body was contacted for comment.
John Ely Senior